Unrestricted Transportation of Plastic Debris

Unrestricted Transportation of Plastic Debris

The United Nations (UN) plastics agreement negotiations, involving around 180 countries, have hit a deadlock as of mid-August 2025. The fifth session (INC-5.2) held in Geneva ended on August 15 without reaching an agreement, and talks are set to resume at an unscheduled future date, missing the original 2024 deadline for a global plastics treaty.

The negotiations, initially scheduled for 2022, have been marred by opposing positions among countries. On one side, an ambitious majority, comprising over 100 countries, advocates for a binding global treaty addressing the full lifecycle of plastics, from design and production to waste management. They seek legally enforceable measures to reduce plastic pollution and tackle plastic at its source.

On the other side, a minority led by the United States and petrochemical-producing countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, resists binding commitments and pushes for a focus on waste management rather than limiting plastic production. This group also includes heavy industry lobbying, with hundreds of fossil fuel and chemical industry lobbyists influencing the talks.

This division and the blocking stance of petro-states have led to no consensus being reached. The failure of the negotiations has been labelled an "ecological catastrophe" by Henning Wilts from the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, Energy.

Key stakeholders, including civil society, Indigenous groups, and environmentalists, side with the ambitious countries, rejecting a weak treaty and calling for a reformed negotiation process to break future deadlocks.

Observers consider an agreement between this group and China and Indonesia important, as these countries are main producers of plastic and plastic waste. Melanie Bergmann from the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research suggests that progressive countries should use the time until the next round of negotiations to build alliances and strategically position themselves to achieve a truly effective agreement.

Despite the stalemate, diplomacy and more timely formats for discussions can be found even between negotiations, according to Bergmann. EU Environment Commissioner Jessika Roswall stated that Geneva had created a good basis for the resumption of negotiations.

However, without a suitable global framework, there will be an increase in plastic production and waste quantities that recycling cannot keep up with, according to Wilts. Germany, which generates the largest amount of packaging waste in the EU, around 18 million tons, is particularly affected.

Countries of the global South have criticised the lack of progress, stating that it means millions of tons of plastic waste will continue to be dumped into oceans. David Azoulay from the Center for International Environmental Law calls for a restart of the negotiations and for countries that want a contract to leave the process and conclude a contract of the willing.

Barbara Metz from the German Environmental Aid urged for concrete measures to curb the environmental impacts of plastic waste at the national level. Numerous delegates refused to use the document as a basis for their negotiations, considering it too weak.

State Secretary Jochen Flasbarth explained that more time might be needed to reach the goal and that it is worth continuing negotiations. The head of the negotiation committee presented a further revised draft contract in the early hours of Friday.

The movement to end plastic pollution continues, according to Azoulay. However, the pollution affects not only the environment but also the ecosystem, food security, livelihoods, and culture of islands such as those represented by the government of Tuvalu.

In conclusion, despite broad international recognition of the plastic pollution crisis, the UN plastics treaty talks remain deadlocked due to a minority of countries, particularly fossil fuel-producing nations and their allied lobbyists, opposing binding measures that would cut plastic production at the source.

1. The United Nations (UN) plastics agreement negotiations, involving around 180 countries, have encountered a standstill, unable to reach an agreement by mid-August 2025.
2. A binding global treaty addressing the full lifecycle of plastics, from design and production to waste management, is advocated for by an ambitious majority of over 100 countries.
3. On the contrary, a minority, led by the United States and petrochemical-producing countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, resists binding commitments and favors a focus on waste management rather than limiting plastic production.
4. Key stakeholders, including Indigenous groups, civil society, and environmentalists, support the ambitions countries, calling for a reformed negotiation process and a strong treaty to break future deadlocks.
5. China and Indonesia, being main producers of plastic and plastic waste, are considered important for any potential agreement.
6. Melanie Bergmann from the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research suggests that progressive countries should use the time until the next round of negotiations to build alliances and strategically position themselves to achieve a truly effective agreement.
7. The failed negotiations have been labeled an "ecological catastrophe" by Henning Wilts from the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment, Energy, who predicts an increase in plastic production and waste quantities that recycling cannot keep up with.
8. David Azoulay from the Center for International Environmental Law calls for a restart of the UN plastics treaty negotiations, suggesting that countries that want a strong contract should leave the process and conclude a contract of the willing.

Read also: